Become A Millionaire; The Millionaire Business Planning Guides Manuals and Instructions;Become a Millionaire with NDITC, Guaranteed Free Online Guidebooks Workbooks and Seminars. You can become America's next millionaire by learning and then teaching the money making secrets of the Fortune 500 group.

Become A Millionaire; The Millionaire Business Planning Guides Manuals and Instructions;Become a Millionaire with NDITC, Guaranteed Free Online Guidebooks Workbooks and Seminars.  You can become America's next millionaire by learning and then teaching the money making secrets of the Fortune 500 group.

Become A Millionaire and work at home at the same time.  Make More Money, Become A Millionaire in America. You can become the newest Millionaire in America and NDITC is willing to help you free. NDITC New Deal Ink and Toner Company Start Your Own inkjet and laser toner  printer cartridge company, home based, packed full of cash profits so register your zip code today. Start Your Own HP Hewlett Packard Home Based Inkjet and Laser Toner Printer Cartridge dealership, free for the asking.

Looking for a Job, Start your own career with no money, no credit card and you never need a lawyer. Start Your Own Inkjet Laser Toner Printer Cartridge Business NDITC Business Plans Guides Articles Research Factory Wholesale Suppliers Catalogs Price Sheets Importers Exporters Blueprints NDITC New Deal Ink and Toner Company Mechanicsburg Pa U.S.A. Factory Directory Wholesale Blueprints NDITC Small Business Start Your Own Inkjet Laser Toner Printer Cartridge Business NDITC Business Plans Guides Articles Research Factory Wholesale Suppliers Catalogs Price Sheets Importers Exporters Blueprints NDITC New Deal Ink and Toner Company Mechanicsburg Pa U.S.A. Factory Directory Wholesale NDITC Inkjet Toner Business Opportunity How To Become A Millionaire This Year NDITC New Deal Ink Toner Company Inkjet Printer Cartridges Toner Printer Cartridges HP Hewlett Packard Dealership Dealers Wanted Resellers Wanted Wholesale Factory Direct NDITC Cartridges Home Based Millionaire Secrets NDITC Laser Toner Printer Cartridges Wholesale Factory Catalog Price Sheets Advertising Small Business SBA systems designs solutions HP Millionaire Blueprint NDITC New Deal Ink Toner Company Start Inkjet Toner Printer Cartridge Business NDITC Make A Millionaire This Year Refilling Without machines Global Blueprint Business Planning SBA Small Business Administration

 NDITC Guides Books Manuals Start Your Own Global Inkjet Toner Printer Cartridge Business HP Hewlett Packard NDITC NAND Global Supply Chain Inkjet Toner Printer Cartridges Business Model Blue Prints Business Plans Refilling Refill HP NDITC New Deal Ink Toner Company Gregory Bodenhamer Start Business Make A Million Get Rich NDITC Manuals Guides Catalogs Coupons Wholesale Factories Dealers Wanted Resellers Wanted NDITC Become A Millionaire Get Rich  Inkjet Toner Printer Cartridges Global Business Planning HP Hewlett Packard NDITC NAND Global Supply Chain Inkjet Toner Printer Cartridges Business Model Blue Prints Business Plans Refilling Refill HP NDITC New Deal Ink Toner Company Gregory Bodenhamer Start Business Make A Million Get Rich NDITC Manuals Guides Catalogs Coupons Wholesale Factories Dealers Wanted Resellers Wanted NDITC International Supply Chain Secrets Fulfillment Distribution Warehousing Wholesale Factory Wholesale Prices American NDITC Factory Prices Catalog Deals Discounts Coupons NDITC Big retailers like Staples Inc and Office Max and others are crushing the small mom-pop inkjet refill toner recharging business owners. They (major retailers) are buying up the empty (virgin core) inkjet and toner cartridges by the millions.

The big O.E.M. Original Equipment Manufacturing companies are funding this so called green-save the world- save the planet effort- to protect their massive inkjet and toner cartridge profits. They have a simple plan. If you cannot get hold of an empty inkjet or toner cartridge you cannot refill it. They’re putting the little guys out of business.

Franchise operators and inkjet refilling machine makers overlook these important facts about the business. They tend to disregard the entire story to sell you their plans, refill machines and other expensive supplies.

You won’t have to worry with NDITC

If you go back five to ten years the cartridge refilling or inkjet refilling business was a boom of opportunity. If you go back further, in certain ways, the cartridge refilling business was really a gold rush.

People by the thousands were hurrying around trying to buy inkjet refill machines. Hundreds of people borrowed money to purchase a franchise to refill inkjet and laser toner printer cartridges.

This opportunity has dramatically changed. We’re going to teach you about this opportunity and help you start your business.

NDITC sells inkjet and laser toner printer cartridge business plans. You’re going to start your own business and you’re going to make money. Every strategy plan comes with pre-paid consultingby phone, email or in person depending on the plan you may purchase.

You’re going to own your own inkjet refill business without ever owning any inkjet refill machine. Believe us, this is a big deal. You can purchase finished and ready to print inkjet cartridges by the thousands for the price of one cheap leaky imported refilling machine. With NDITC you can purchase over 11,000 Canon inkjet cartridges for the price of one worthless inkjet refilling machine. A low-priced and economical inkjet refilling machine costs about five thousand dollars. This does not include supplies, bulk ink, safeguarding by insurance, expensive repairs and upkeep not to mention it really takes a long time to refill an inkjet cartridge. If you’re refilling a bad cartridge, you do it all for nothing and you gain a very mad customer when they find out that is doesn’t work.

NDITC has the better way. You will have no repair expenses. You will have no upkeep expenses.

The $5,000 investment in inkjet cartridges, for example, would create total gross sales of $174,000.00. What’s better than this you never have to spend that much money, if any at all?

You can buy one cartridge, five cartridges or never buy any and just have them drop shipped after you get paid. We’ll also teach you about consumer-customer economics where your customers finance everything and you spend nothing. Customers bankroll every business but we’ll show you how to get their money first and you just keep the profits. Money Matters.

NDITC is the best way and the new way and the only New Deal Ink and Toner Company in the American market-place today.

You see, what’s really changed is that people are not buying refilled cartridges like they did a few years ago. Wow!

If the customer base is moving away from cheap leaky refills, you don’t need thousands of dollars for some cheap imported refill machine. Many refill machines are sitting inactive due to no customers across the country. Refill machine owners are not shiftless or work-shy their customers have chosen a better way to purchase their cartridges.

In fact, you never have to buy any machines. You simply buy the cartridges that your customers want to acquire and purchase. It’s simple, easy and risk free and your customers really appreciate the good deal and the good buy.

You never have to rent a building, unless you just want too! You can store up a lot of inkjet or toner cartridges in your basement or closet. Don’t laugh too loud. You can squirrel away hundreds of inkjet printer cartridges in something the size of your luggage or overnight bag.

You don’t have to buy a bunch of supplies and you surely don’t need any franchise deal.

Inkjet printer cartridges are small but, most importantly they’re big time money makers.

Become A Millionaire Become Rich Find A Job Work From Home NDITC Book Download Free Drop Shipping Factory Direct Inkjet Toner Cartridges Copier Printer Fax NDITC Ink Printer Ink Cartridge Refill Ink Cartridges Toner Cartridges Cheap Ink Refills NDITC SBA Small Business Administration Start Small Business Home Based Commercial SBA Grants SBA Loans How To Start A Business NDITC Business Plan Small Business SBA Business Funding Business Ideas Business Administration Business Loans Best Small Business Cash Loans Payday Loans Online Payday Cash Advance Make Fast Free Money Loans Grant Quick Loan Cash Loans New Deal Ink Toner Company Consulting Seminars Workbooks Guides Guidebooks Wholesale Factory Dealers Agents Merchants Machines Manuals Re-Sellers Retailers Ink Toner Printer Copier Cartridges New Rebuilt Recycled Re-Manufactured Direct Import Export Fulfillment Distribution Transportation Online Internet Store Home Business Jobs Work Careers Online Jobs Starting A Business Franchise Home Jobs Business For Sale Small Business Business Ideas Start Own Online Business Business Opportunity Best Business Best Small Business Best Business Idea NDITC Start Small New Business Home Moms Start Home Home Opportunity Need Money Need Help Free Books Over 50 Years Old Unemployment Urban Government Grant Workforce Grant Employment Job Openings

NDITC Explains Home Based business opportunities Gregory Bodenhamer Mechanicsburg Pa Cooperation is the KEY TO MAKING MONEY Learn More Learn How NDITC Freedom requires individuals to be free to use their own resources in their own way, and modern society requires cooperation among a large number of people. The question is, how can you have cooperation without coercion? If you have a central direction you inevitably have coercion. The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.

INTERVIEWER: Why are free markets and freedom inseparable?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Freedom requires individuals to be free to use their own resources in their own way, and modern society requires cooperation among a large number of people. The question is, how can you have cooperation without coercion? If you have a central direction you inevitably have coercion. The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTERVIEWER: Marxists say that property is theft. Why, in your view, is private property so central to freedom?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Because the only way in which you can be free to bring your knowledge to bear in your particular way is by controlling your property. If you don't control your property, if somebody else controls it, they're going to decide what to do with it, and you have no possibility of exercising influence on it.

The interesting thing is that there's a lot of knowledge in this society, but, as Friedrich Hayek emphasized so strongly, that knowledge is divided. I have some knowledge; you have some knowledge; he has some knowledge. How do we bring these scattered bits of knowledge back together? And how do we make it in the self-interest of individuals to use that knowledge efficiently?

The key to that is private property, because if it belongs to me, you know, there's an obvious fact. Nobody spends somebody else's money as carefully as he spends his own. Nobody uses somebody else's resources as carefully as he uses his own.

So if you want efficiency and effectiveness, if you want knowledge to be properly utilized, you have to do it through the means of private property.

Free markets, black markets and the law.

INTERVIEWER: Tell me why you can see the black market as a positive thing?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, the black market was a way of getting around government controls. It was a way of enabling the free market to work. It was a way of opening up, enabling people. You want to trade with me, and the law won't let you. But that trade will be mutually beneficial to both of us. The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit. The big difference between government coercion and private markets is that government can use coercion to make an exchange in which A benefits and B loses. But in the market, if A and B come to a voluntary agreement, it's because both of them are better off. And that's what the black market does, is to get around these artificial government restrictions.

Now, obviously you'd like a world in which you obey the law. The fact that the black market involves breaking the law is something against it. It's an undesirable feature. But this only exists when there are bad laws. And nobody, nobody believes that obeying every law is an ultimate moral principle. There comes a point, if you look back at the history of law obedience -- think of conscientious objection during wars -- I think you will see that everybody agrees that there is a point at which there is a higher law than the legislative law.

On Friedrich Hayek

INTERVIEWER: Do you remember reading Hayek's Road to Serfdom? Did that have an impact on you?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Yes, it certainly did have an impact. It was a very clear, definite statement of certain fundamental ideas. It was a passionate plea by a passionate man, and so it was very well written, and for those of us who were concerned about these kinds of issues, I think it had a tremendous impact.

In fact, I've often gone around and asked people what determined their views. I've asked people who were in favor of free markets and free enterprise, who formerly had been of a different view, what caused them to change their mind.

I'm talking particularly not about economists, not about professionals, but generally ordinary people, most of whom had been socialist or in favor of government control at one time and had come over to free markets. And two names have come up over and over again: Hayek on the one hand, The Road to Serfdom from Hayek, and Ayn Rand on the other, Atlas Shrugged and her other books.

INTERVIEWER: You were invited to Friederich Hayek's first Mont Pelerin meeting in 1947. Why?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, I was invited primarily because of my brother-in-law, Aaron Director. He was an economist teaching [at] the University of Chicago, and when Hayek's Road to Serfdom was submitted to American publishers, one publisher after another rejected it. He was finally published by the University of Chicago Press, partly because of Aaron Director's intervention. He wasn't at Chicago at the time, he was in Washington, but he knew the director of the press, and he also was very close to Frank Knight, who was a professor at Chicago. And so Aaron had a considerable role in getting The Road to Serfdom published.

Also, he had studied at the London School of Economics and had met Hayek [there] before. One of the people whom Hayek was in touch with when he was exploring the possibilities of having the Mont Pelerin meeting was there. And so Aaron organized a group from the University of Chicago. There was myself, there was George Stigler, there was Frank Knight, and there was Aaron Director.

INTERVIEWER: What kind of people gathered at Mont Pelerin, and what was the point of the meeting?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: The point of the meeting was very clear. It was Hayek's belief, and the belief of other people who joined him there, that freedom was in serious danger. During the war, every country had relied heavily on government to organize the economy, to shift all production toward armaments and military purposes.

And you came out of the war with the widespread belief that the war had demonstrated that central planning would work. It reinforced the lesson that had earlier been driven home, supposedly, by Russia. The left in particular, or the intellectuals in general in Britain and the United States, in France, wherever, had interpreted Russia as a successful experiment in central planning. And so there were strong movements everywhere. In Britain a socialist [Clement Attlee] had won the election. In France there was indicative planning that was [in] development. And so everywhere, Hayek and others felt that freedom was very much imperiled, that the world was turning toward planning and that somehow we had to develop an intellectual current that would offset that movement. This was the theme of The Road to Serfdom.

Essentially, the Mont Pelerin Society was an attempt to offset The Road to Serfdom, to start a movement, a road to freedom as it were.

Now, who were the people who were there? There were economists, historians, mostly economists and historians, but a few journalists and businessmen, people who, despite the general intellectual current moving towards socialism, had retained the belief in free markets and in political and economic freedom. They were those people whom Hayek happened to know, or whom he had met, whom he had run into in the course of his travels.

INTERVIEWER: Now what was Hayek's role at these meetings and what was he like personally? This must have been the first time you met him.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: No, I had met him before that. I had met him in Chicago when he was in the United States lecturing on The Road to Serfdom. Hayek's role? Number one, he was responsible for the meeting. He organized it. He selected the people who were going to be there.

He helped to line up some of the money that was used to finance it, though a considerable part of that came from a Swiss source. That's why it was held in Switzerland.

So far as his role at the meetings was concerned, he gave a talk at the opening session which set out what he had in mind. Along with several other people, he set up the agenda and presided over some of the sessions, participated in the debates, and was a very effective participant from beginning to end.

INTERVIEWER: Some of those debates became very, very heated. I think [Ludwig] von Mises once stormed out.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Oh, yes, he did. Yes, in the middle of a debate on the subject of distribution of income, in which you had people who you would hardly call socialist or egalitarian -- people like Lionel Robbins, like George Stigler, like Frank Knight, like myself -- Mises got up and said, "You're all a bunch of socialists," and walked right out of the room. (laughs) But Mises was a person of very strong views and rather intolerant about any differences of opinion.

INTERVIEWER: What was Hayek's personal style? What was he like personally?

MILTON FRIEDMAN Oh, personally Hayek was a lovely man, a pure intellectual. He was seriously interested in the truth and in understanding. He differed very much in this way from Mises. There was none of that same kind of manner. He accepted disagreement and wanted to argue, wanted to reason about it and discuss it. He was a very cultured and delightful companion on any occasion. ... I must say, he undoubtedly was the dominant figure in all of the Mont Pelerin meetings for many, many years.

On John Maynard Keynes

INTERVIEWER: What impact did John Maynard Keynes have on you?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, I read his book, of course, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, as everybody else did. I may say I had earlier read a good deal of Keynes. In fact, in my opinion, one of the best books he wrote was published in 1924 I believe, A Tract on Monetary Reform, which I think is really, in the long run, fundamentally better than The General Theory, which came much later. And so I was exposed to Keynes as a graduate student, and his General Theory was in the air. Everybody was talking about it. It was part of the general atmosphere.

It was when I went back and looked at some memos that I had written while I was working at the Treasury that I discovered how much more Keynesian I was than I thought. (amused)

So what was his influence on me? It was, as on everybody else, to emphasize fiscal policy as opposed to monetary policy, and in particular to pay relatively little attention to the quantity of money as opposed to the interest rate.

INTERVIEWER: On a personal level, what contact did you have with him?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: With Keynes? The only contact I had with him was to submit an article to the Economic Journal which he was editor of, which he refused and rejected. I had no personal contact with him other than that.

INTERVIEWER: What did the rejection say?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, it was an article which was critical of something that A.C. Pigou, a professor in London and at Cambridge, had written. And Keynes wrote back that he had shown my article to Pigou. Pigou did not agree with the criticism, and so he had decided to reject it. The article was subsequently published by the Quarterly Journal of Economics, and Pigou wrote a rejoinder to it.

INTERVIEWER: When did you begin to break with Keynes and why? What were the first doubts you had?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Very shortly after the war, when I came to the University of Chicago and started working on money and its relation to the economic cycle. I cannot tell you exactly when, but very shortly thereafter, as I studied the facts, they seemed to me to contradict what Keynesian theory would call for.

INTERVIEWER: What was it that you studied that made you begin to feel that this didn't add up?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Let me emphasize [that] I think Keynes was a great economist. I think his particular theory in The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money is a fascinating theory. It's a right kind of a theory. It's one which says a lot by using only a little. So it's a theory that has great potentiality.

And you know, in all of science, progress comes through people proposing hypotheses which are subject to test and rejected and replaced by better hypotheses. And Keynes's theory, in my opinion, was one of those very productive hypotheses -- a very ingenious one, a very intelligent one. It just turned out to be incompatible with the facts when it was put to the test. So I'm not criticizing Keynes. I am a great admirer of Keynes as an economist, much more than on the political level. On the political level, that's a different question, but as an economist, he was brilliant and one of the great economists.

Now, the crucial issue is, which is more important in determining the short-run course of the economy? What happens to investment on the one hand, or what happens to the quantity of money on the other hand? What happens to fiscal policy on the one hand, or what happens to monetary policy on the other hand?

And the facts that led me to believe that his hypothesis was not correct was that again and again it turned out that what happened to the quantity of money was far more important than what was happening to investments.

The essential difference between the Keynesian theory and the pre-Keynesian, or the monetarist theory, as it was developed, is whether what's important to understanding the short-run movements of the economy is the relation between the flow of investments -- the amount of money being spent on new investments, on the one hand, or the flow of money, the quantity of money in the economy and what's happening to it.

By the quantity of money I just mean the cash that people count, carry around in their pockets and the deposits that they have in banks on which they can write checks. That's the quantity of money. And the quantity of money is controlled by monetary policy.

On the investment side, the flow of investment is controlled by private individuals, but is also affected by fiscal policy, by government taxing and government spending.

The essential Keynesian argument, the basic Keynesian argument, was that the way to affect what happened to the economy as a whole, not to a particular part of it, but to the level of income, of employment and so on, was through fiscal policy, through changing government taxes and spending.

The argument from the monetarists' side was that what was more important was what was happening to the quantity of money, monetary policy on that side. And so, as I examined the facts about these phenomena, it more and more became clear that what was important was the flow of money as compared to the flow of government spending, and when fiscal policy and monetary policy went in the same direction, you couldn't tell which was more important. But if you looked at those periods when fiscal policy went in one direction and monetary policy went in another direction, invariably it was what happened to monetary policy that determined matters.

The public event that changed the opinion of the profession and of people at large was the stagflation of the 1970s, because under the Keynesian view, that was a period in which you had a very expansive fiscal policy, in which you should have had a great expansion in the economy. Instead you had two things at the same time, which under the Keynesian view would have been impossible: You had stagnation in the economy, a high level of unemployment. You had inflation with prices rising rapidly. We had predicted in advance that that would be what happened, and when it happened, it was very effective in leading people to believe that maybe there was something to what before had been regarded as utter nonsense.

INTERVIEWER: Was stagflation the end for Keynesianism?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Stagflation was the end of naive Keynesianism. Now, obviously the term "Keynesian" can mean anything you want it to mean, and so you have new Keynesianism, but this particular feature was put to an end by the stagflation episode.

INTERVIEWER: Talking about Keynesian policies, John Kenneth Galbraith, when we talked to him a few days ago, said that World War II "affirmed Keynes and his policies." Do you agree?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: No, I don't agree at all. World War II affirmed what everybody knew for a long time. If you print enough money and spend it you can create an appearance of activity and prosperity. That's what it confirmed. It did not confirm his theories about how you preserve full employment over a long time.

The Great Depression

INTERVIEWER: You've written that what really caused the Depression was mistakes by the government. Looking back now, what in your view was the actual cause?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, we have to distinguish between the recession of 1929, the early stages, and the conversion of that recession into a major catastrophe. The recession was an ordinary business cycle. We had repeated recessions over hundreds of years, but what converted [this one] into a major depression was bad monetary policy.

The Federal Reserve system had been established to prevent what actually happened. It was set up to avoid a situation in which you would have to close down banks, in which you would have a banking crisis. And yet, under the Federal Reserve system, you had the worst banking crisis in the history of the United States. There's no other example I can think of, of a government measure which produced so clearly the opposite of the results that were intended.

And what happened is that [the Federal Reserve] followed policies which led to a decline in the quantity of money by a third. For every $100 in paper money, in deposits, in cash, in currency, in existence in 1929, by the time you got to 1933 there was only about $65, $66 left. And that extraordinary collapse in the banking system, with about a third of the banks failing from beginning to end, with millions of people having their savings essentially washed out, that decline was utterly unnecessary.

At all times, the Federal Reserve had the power and the knowledge to have stopped that. And there were people at the time who were all the time urging them to do that. So it was, in my opinion, clearly a mistake of policy that led to the Great Depression.

INTERVIEWER: How did the Depression change your life and your career plans? You started out [with plans] to become an insurance actuary; instead you became an economist.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, I don't think that's very hard to understand. It's 1932. Twenty-five percent of the American working force is unemployed. My major problem with the world is a problem of scarcity in the midst of plenty... of people starving while there are unused resources... people having skills which are not being used.

If you're a 19-year-old college senior, which is going to be more important to you: figuring out what the right prices ought to be for life insurance, or trying to understand how the world got into that kind of a mess?

Why are you not, and why have you never been a communist?

INTERVIEWER: A lot of people in the '30s were drawn to the left. So why are you not and why have you never been a communist?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: (laughs) No, I've not, never been a communist. Never even been a socialist -- [though] it may well be that I harbored socialist thoughts at the time when I was an undergraduate. But undoubtedly [the fact that I'm not a communist] is tied in with the accident that I went to the University of Chicago for graduate study, and at the department of economics at the University of Chicago, they were classical liberal economists.

Classical economics, which begins with Adam Smith, with his book The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776, the same year as the American Revolution and the American Declaration of Independence, emphasizes the individual as the ultimate objective of science. And the question of economic science is how to explain the way in which individuals interact with one another, to use their limited resources to satisfy their alternative ends.

The emphasis is on the fact that there are many objectives that people have. There are limited resources to satisfy them. What's the mechanism whereby you decide which ends are to be satisfied for which people in what way? And the emphasis in the classical liberal economists is on doing that through free markets.

Did you support Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal?

INTERVIEWER: Now, at the time of the Depression, did you personally support New Deal policies?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: You're now talking not about the Depression, but the post-Depression. At least the bottom of the Depression was in 1933.

You have to distinguish between two classes of New Deal policies. One class of New Deal policies was reform: wage and price control, the Blue Eagle, the national industrial recovery movement. I did not support those. The other part of the new deal policy was relief and recovery... providing relief for the unemployed, providing jobs for the unemployed, and motivating the economy to expand... an expansive monetary policy. Those parts of the New Deal I did support.

INTERVIEWER: But why did you support those?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Because it was a very exceptional circumstance. We'd gotten into an extraordinarily difficult situation, unprecedented in the nation's history. You had millions of people out of work. Something had to be done; it was intolerable. And it was a case in which, unlike most cases, the short run deserved to dominate.

I want to emphasize that you're talking about a long time ago. I was very young and unsophisticated, inexperienced, and I can't swear to you that what I'm saying now is actually what I believed then. I don't have any record of what my specific attitude was toward the New Deal policies. I must confess that probably I was thinking at that time more about my own interests and position than I was about these broader issues. So I think this is somewhat retrospective thinking rather than thinking at the time.

On Richard Nixon

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Nixon was the most socialist of the presidents of the United States in the 20th century.

INTERVIEWER: I've heard Nixon accused of many things, but never [of being] a socialist before.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, his ideas were not socialist -- quite the opposite -- but if you look at what happened during his administration, first of all, the number of pages in the Federal Register, which is full of regulations about business, doubled during his regime. During his regime the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, was established and the OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the OECA [the EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance] -- about a dozen, a half dozen alphabetic agencies were established, so that you had the biggest increase in government regulation and control of industry during the Nixon administration that you had in the whole postwar period.

INTERVIEWER: Tell us how Nixon decided to adopt wage and price controls.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Nixon, as you know, had been in the price control organization during World War II and understood that price controls were a very bad idea, and so he was strongly opposed to price controls. Yet in 1971, August 15, 1971, he adopted wage and price controls. And the reason he did it, in my opinion, was because of something else that was happening, and that had to do with the exchange rate; that had to do with Breton Woods and the agreement to peg the price of gold.

The U.S. had agreed in 1944, at the Breton Woods Conference, on an international financial system under which other countries would link their currencies to the U.S. dollar, and the U.S. would link its currency to gold and keep the price of gold at $35 an ounce. And because of the policies that were followed by the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, it had become very difficult to do that. We had had inflationary policies, which led to a tendency for the gold to flow out, for the price of gold to go above $35 an ounce. And the situation had become very critical in 1971.

Nixon had to do something about that. If he had done nothing but close the gold window, if he had said the U.S. is going off the gold standard and done nothing else, every headline in every newspaper would have been: "That negative Nixon again! Just a negative act."

And so instead he dressed it up by making it part of a general economic policy, a recovery policy in which wage and price controls, which the Democrats had been urging all along, became a major element. And by putting together the combination of closing the gold window and at the same time having wage and price controls, he converted what would have been a negative from a political point of view to a political positive. And that was the political reason for which he did it.

INTERVIEWER: There is a photograph of you and George Schultz with Nixon in the Oval Office. What did you say to him on that occasion? What did you tell him?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, I don't know what occasion that particular one was, but the one that's relevant to your question is the last time I saw Nixon in the Oval Office with George Schultz. What we usually discussed when Nixon wanted to talk was the state of the economy: what monetary policy was doing.

Nixon was a very, very smart person. In fact, he had one of the highest IQs of any public official I've met. The problem with Nixon was not intelligence and not prejudices. The problem with him was that he was willing to sacrifice principles too easily for political advantage.

But at any rate, as I was getting up to leave, President Nixon said to me, "Don't blame George for this silly business of wage and price controls," meaning George Schultz. And I believe I said to him, I think I said to him, "Oh, no, Mr. President. I don't blame George; I blame you! " (laughs)

And that, I think, was the last thing I said to him. Now, the interesting point of that story is that the Nixon tapes are now available, and I have been trying to get that part of the Nixon tapes, but I haven't been able to get them yet. I want to make sure I didn't make this up.

On Ronald Reagan

INTERVIEWER: Tell us briefly how Paul Volcker set out to squeeze inflation out of the economy.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, by the time Paul Volcker came along -- this was in 1968-69 [Volcker was undersecratary in the Treasury Department from 1969-74, president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from 1975-79, and appointed chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board from 1979-87.] -- inflation had gotten very high and had gone up close to 20 percent. He was at a meeting of the International Monetary Fund in Yugoslavia in 1979 (q/c date), when the U.S. came under great criticism from the other people there for our inflationary policies. And he came back to the United States and had got the open-market committee to announce that they would change their policy and shift from controlling interest rates to controlling the quantity of money.

Now, this was mostly verbal rhetoric. What he really wanted to do was to have the interest rate go up very high to reflect the amount of inflation, but he could do it better by professing that he wasn't controlling it and that he was controlling the quantity of money, and the right policy at that time was to limit what was happening to the quantity of money, and that meant the interest rate shot way up. This is a complex story.

It isn't all one way, because in early 1980 (q/c date) President Carter introduced controls on installment spending, and that caused a very sharp collapse in the credit market and caused a very sharp downward spiral in the economy. In counter to that, the Federal Reserve increased the money supply very rapidly. In the five months before the 1980 election, the money supply went up more rapidly than in any other five-month period in the postwar era. Immediately after him, Reagan was elected, and the money supply started going down. So that was a very political reaction during that period.

INTERVIEWER: How important was President Reagan's support for Volcker's policies?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Enormously important. There is no other president in the postwar period who would have stood by without trying to interfere, to intervene with the Federal Reserve.

The situation was this: The only way you could get the inflation down was by having monetary contraction. There was no way you could do that without having a temporary recession. The great error in the earlier period had been that whenever there was a little contraction, there was a tendency to expand the money supply rapidly in order to avoid unemployment. That stop-and-go policy was really what bedeviled the Fed during the '60s and '70s.

That was the situation in 1980, in '81 in particular. After Reagan came into office, the Fed did step on the money supply, did hold down its growth, and that did lead to a recession.

At that point every other president would have immediately come in and tried to get the Federal Reserve to expand. Reagan knew what was happening. He understood very well that the only way he could get inflation down was by accepting a temporary recession, and he supported Volcker and did not try to intervene.

Now, you know, there is a myth that Reagan was somehow simpleminded and didn't understand these things. That's a bunch of nonsense. He understood this issue very well. And I know -- I can speak with, I think, authority on this -- that he realized what he was doing, and he knew very well that he was risking his political standing in order to achieve a basic economic objective. And, as you know, his poll ratings went way down in 1982, and then, when the inflation seemed to be broken enough, the Fed reversed policy, started to expand the money supply, the economy recovered, and along with it, Reagan's poll ratings went back up.

INTERVIEWER: And the economy has been pretty solid ever since. [As of the year 2000.]

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Yes, absolutely. There is no doubt in my mind that that action of Reagan, plus his emphasis on lowering tax rates, plus his emphasis on deregulating... I mentioned that the regulations had doubled, the number of pages in the Federal Register had doubled, during the Nixon regime; they almost halved during the Reagan regime. So those actions of Reagan unleashed the basic constructive forces of the free market and from 1983 on, it's been almost entirely up.

INTERVIEWER: What Reagan was doing was almost exactly mirrored in Britain by what Mrs. Thatcher was doing at about the same time.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Absolutely.

INTERVIEWER: Were the two influencing to each other, or was it just a case of ideas coming into their own?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Both of them faced similar situations. And both of them, fortunately, had exposure to similar ideas. They reinforced one another. Each saw the success of the other. I think that the coincidence of Thatcher and Reagan having been in office at the same time was enormously important for the public acceptance, worldwide, of a different approach to economic and monetary policy.

On his role in Chile under Pinochet

INTERVIEWER: Tell us about some of the abuse you had to suffer and the degree to which you were seen as a figure out on the fringes.

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Well, I wouldn't call it abuse, really. (laughs) I enjoyed it. The only thing I would call abuse was in connection with the Chilean episode, when Allende was thrown out in Chile, and a new government came in that was headed by Pinochet.

At that time, for an accidental reason, the only economists in Chile who were not tainted with the connection to Allende were a group that had been trained at the University of Chicago, who got to be known as the Chicago Boys. And at one stage I went down to Chile and spent five days there with another group -- there were three or four of us from Chicago -- giving a series of lectures on the Chilean problem, particularly the problem of inflation and how they should proceed to do something about it.

The communists were determined to overthrow Pinochet. It was very important to them, because Allende's regime, they thought, was going to bring a communist state in through regular political channels, not by revolution. And here Pinochet overthrew that. They were determined to discredit Pinochet. As a result, they were going to discredit anybody who had anything to do with him, and in that connection, I was subject to abuse in the sense that there were large demonstrations against me at the Nobel ceremonies in Stockholm. I remember seeing the same faces in the crowd in a talk in Chicago and a talk in Santiago. And there was no doubt that there was a concerted effort to tar and feather me.

INTERVIEWER: It seems to us that Chile deserves a place in history because it's the first country to put Chicago theory into practice. Do you agree?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: No, no, no. Not at all. After all, Great Britain put Chicago theory in practice in the 19th century. (amused) The United States put the Chicago theory in practice in the 19th and 20th century. I don't believe that's right.

INTERVIEWER: You don't see Chile as a small turning point then?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: It may have been a turning point, but not because it was the first place to put the Chicago theory in practice. It was important on the political side, not so much on the economic side.

Here was the first case in which you had a movement toward communism which was replaced by a movement toward free markets. See, the really extraordinary thing about the Chilean case was that a military government followed the opposite of military policies.

The military is distinguished from the ordinary economy by the fact that it's a top-down organization. The general tells the colonel, the colonel tells the captain, and so on down, whereas a market is a bottom-up organization. The customer goes into the store and tells the retailer what he wants, the retailer sends it back up the line to the manufacturer, and so on. So the basic organizational principles in the military are almost the opposite of the basic organizational principles of a free market and a free society.

And the really remarkable thing about Chile is that the military adopted the free-market arrangements instead of the military arrangements.

INTERVIEWER: When you were down in Chile you spoke to some students in Santiago. Can you tell me about that speech in Santiago?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Sure. While I was in Santiago, Chile, I gave a talk at the Catholic University of Chile. Now, I should explain that the University of Chicago had had an arrangement for years with the Catholic University of Chile whereby they send students to us and we send people down there to help them reorganize their economics department. And I gave a talk at the Catholic University of Chile under the title "The Fragility of Freedom."

The essence of the talk was that freedom was a very fragile thing and that what destroyed it more than anything else was central control; that in order to maintain freedom, you had to have free markets, and that free markets would work best if you had political freedom. So it was essentially an anti-totalitarian talk. (amused)

INTERVIEWER: So you envisaged, therefore, that the free markets ultimately would undermine Pinochet?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Oh, absolutely. The emphasis of that talk was that free markets would undermine political centralization and political control.

And incidentally, I should say that I was not in Chile as a guest of the government. I was in Chile as the guest of a private organization.

INTERVIEWER: Do you think the Chile affair damaged your reputation, or more importantly, made it harder for you to get your ideas across?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: That's a very hard thing to say, because I think it had effects in both directions. It got a lot of publicity. It made a lot of people familiar with the views who would not otherwise have been. On the other hand, in terms of the political side of it, as you realize, most of the intellectual community, the intellectual elite, as it were, were on the side of Allende, not on the side of Pinochet. And so in a sense they regarded me as a traitor for having been willing to talk in Chile.

I must say, it's such a wonderful example of a double standard, because I had spent time in Yugoslavia, which was a communist country. I later gave a series of lectures in China. When I came back from communist China, I wrote a letter to the Stanford Daily newspaper in which I said: '"It's curious. I gave exactly the same lectures in China that I gave in Chile.

I have had many demonstrations against me for what I said in Chile. Nobody has made any objections to what I said in China. How come?"

INTERVIEWER: In the end, the Chilean [economy] did quite well, didn't it?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Oh, very well. Extremely well. The Chilean economy did very well, but more important, in the end the central government, the military junta, was replaced by a democratic society. So the really important thing about the Chilean business is that free markets did work their way in bringing about a free society.

On Politics and the Federal Reserve Bank

FRIEDMAN: I've always thought the independence of the Federal Reserve was not very meaningful. If you look back at the record and ask would you know more, could you predict monetary policy better by knowing the name of the chairman [of the Federal Reserve Bank] or knowing the name of the president under whom he served, there is no doubt you'd do better knowing the name of the president, not the name of the chairman.

There can't be real independence; there shouldn't be real independence. After all, monetary policy is much too important a function to be put, in a democracy, in the hands of unelected representatives. So that I don't believe. I'm not in favor of independence -- on political grounds more than economic grounds.

Where we stand today

INTERVIEWER: From your apartment, you can almost see Silicon Valley. How do you think information technology, the Internet, the new economy, will affect the big issues of economics and politics that you've devoted your life to?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: The most important ways in which I think the Internet will affect the big issue is that it will make it more difficult for government to collect taxes, and I think that's a very important factor. Governments can most effectively collect taxes on things that can't move. That's why property taxes are invariably the first tax. People can move, so it's a little more difficult to collect taxes on them. States within the United States find it more difficult to collect taxes on people, but the United States as a whole can collect taxes on people more easily. Now the Internet, by enabling transactions to be made in cyberspace, not recorded, by enabling them to move so that somebody in Britain can order books from Amazon.com in the United States, somebody in the United States can do a deal India, I think the cyberspace is going to make it very much more difficult for government to collect taxes, and that will have a very important effect on reducing the role that governments can play.

INTERVIEWER: So we're sort of marching forward to a kind of... the ultimate "Hayekian" state, are we?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: I think we are in that respect. Now, of course it has its advantages and disadvantages. It makes it easier for criminals to conduct their affairs. But, you know, you have to distinguish between criminals and criminals. We have as many criminals as we have because we have as many laws to break as we have. You take the situation in the United States. We have two million people in prison, four million people who are under parole or under supervision. Why? Because of our mistaken attempt to control what people put in their bodies. Prohibition of so called drugs, of illegal drugs, is a major reason for all of those prisons. And those are victimless crimes, which should not be crimes.. Now the internet, by enabling transactions to be made in cyberspace, not recorded, by enabling them to move so that somebody in Britain can order books from Amazon.com in the United States, somebody in the United States can do a deal India,—I think the cyberspace is going to make it very much more difficult for Government to collect taxes. And that will have a very important effect on reducing the role that Governments can play.

INTERVIEWER: So we're sort of marching forward to a kind of, the ultimate "Hayekian" state are we?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: I think we are in that respect. Now, of course it has its advantages and disadvantages. It makes it easier for criminals to conduct their affairs, but, you know, you have to distinguish between criminals and criminals. We have as many criminals as we have because we have as many laws to break as we have. You take the situation in the United States. We have two million people in prison, four million people who are under parole or under supervision. Why? Because of our mistaken attempt to control what people put in their bodies. Prohibition of so-called drugs, of illegal drugs, is a major reason for all of those prisons. And those are victimless crimes, which should not be crimes.

INTERVIEWER: More than half a century after that first meeting in Mont Pelerin, who's won the argument, [and] who lost?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: There is no doubt who won the intellectual argument. There is no doubt that the received intellectual opinion of the world today is much less favorable towards central planning and controls than it was in 1947. What's much more dubious is who won the practical argument.

The world is more socialist today than it was in 1947. Government spending in almost every Western country is higher today than it was in 1947, as a fraction of income, not simply in dollars. Government regulation of business is larger. There has not been a great deal of nationalization, socialization in that sense, but government intervention in the economy has undoubtedly gone up.

The only countries where that is not true are the countries which were formerly part of the communist system. You can see that we won the argument in practice as well as on the intellectual level in Poland, in Czechoslovakia, in Hungary, in Russia, and throughout that part of the world. But in the West the practical argument is as yet undecided.

INTERVIEWER: Are you hopeful?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: Oh, yes, I'm very hopeful about it. Don't misunderstand me. At the moment we have not won the argument in practice, but I think in the long run ideas will dominate, and I think we will win the argument in practice as well as on the intellectual level.

INTERVIEWER: Central controls have been discredited, the governments seem to have retreated remarkably, but are we becoming increasingly regulated?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: You have to distinguish different areas. Some kinds of regulations have declined. Regulations of prices, particular regulations of industries as a whole have declined. Other kinds of regulations, particularly regulations on personal behavior, have gone up. It's social control which has been taking the place of narrow economic control.

INTERVIEWER: Do you feel some of those regulations are ultimately a threat to the free market?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: They're not a threat to the free market. They're a threat to human freedom.

INTERVIEWER: At the moment, governments everywhere are retreating from the marketplace, or seem to be. Do you think a pendulum could swing back the other way?

MILTON FRIEDMAN: The pendulum easily can swing back the other way. It can swing back the other way not because anybody wants to do it in a positive sense, but simply because as long as you have governments which control a great deal of power, there always [will be] pressure from special interests to intervene. And once you get something in government, it's very hard to get it out. So I think there is a real danger. I don't think we can regard the war as won by any manner of means. I think it still is true that it takes continued effort to keep a society free. What's the saying? "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty."

Millionaire 247 Secrets Survival Stability Success Gregory Bodenhamer Mechanicsburg pa GROW YOUR INK and TONER BUSINESS Mechanicsburg Harrisburg York Gettysburg Carlisle Pa Inkjet Laser Toner New Deal Ink and Toner Company

New Deal Ink and Toner Company
Mechanicsburg Pa
http://www.newdealink.com/
New Deal Ink and Toner Company
Mechanicsburg, Pa 17055
Eliminating the printer manufacturing company from the printer customer seems to be the answer. The manufacturer has all the resources, experiences and money to develop and bring to market remarkable printing technology. To take a look at their big dream, it gets a little dark, at time even black. You can hand a clerk at a discount store less than thirty dollars and walk out with a brand new Hewlett Packard color inkjet printer.
http://www.newdealink.com/
The founder of our company, Gregory Bodenhamer New Deal Ink and Toner Company, Mechanicsburg, Pa 17055, started to research the big retailers and manufacturers several years ago. He found the best way to do this was to go directly work for a Fortune 500 company that was directly in the computer, printer, consumable, inkjet, toner cartridge business among other things.
He had the unique opportunity to look inside the big dream, the big plan, the buying and selling of technology like computers, printers, copiers, toner cartridges, inkjet cartridges and everything else you might need for your home business or even another Fortune 500 company.
Yes, he was surprised and he learned more than the hearts desire. He discovered exactly what he wanted to know. Some things just confirmed what he originally thought, yes, they had a lot of money, engineers, managers and a great deal of inventory, across the nation, stacked higher than you can imagine.
One thing that he couldn’t find was a factual bargain. A real, genuine and actual bargain would be the farmer selling one perfect red apple for a dime compared to the next farmer selling a similar apple, from the same tree, for say one dollar. He could not find a valid or authentic value to the consumer other than some discount off the dedicated and firm manufacturers suggested retail price.
“Printer and inkjet or laser cartridge manufacturers require a great deal of resources to produce and distribute your favorite printer and inkjet cartridge. They found their profit opportunity within the inkjet ink cartridge and toner cartridge business. To realize how much wealth they already have you can look in two places. Check the stock market and count the dollars or try to compete with them and land up in court for the rest of your life, I suppose.”
Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D.
The inspiration for the entire business is becoming clear, you wanted to print your posters, workbooks and family pictures in full living color and never leave home, or maybe major companies invented the color inkjet printer and then persuaded millions of people, people just like you, through advertising, pushing cheap printer and copier machines, plug and play technology and created you as a customer with the help of their supply chain retail partners.
http://www.newdealink.com/

“How much more wealth the supply chain can create is becoming a very serious question. The rightful place for a sincere value still remains with the end user or what you and I call the customer. The printer makers, the cartridge makers and their selling partners do not remember to appreciate and be grateful for their customers. Other people and their companies, like Gregory Bodenhamer, New Deal Ink and Toner Company have clearly discovered the cycle of wealth that printer makers and inkjet makers have created and sustained.” “New Deal doesn’t want to create the next best printer” “New Deal Ink and Toner, when you read the name, says a lot. They wanted to create the New Inkjet cartridge customer.” “The founder wanted his own factory”
Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D.
It seems that your luxury comes as a guest. You will buy expensive ink or you will not enjoy the printer technology of the day. The manufacturers gave you the luxury you wanted, the royal colors you demanded and you’ve become the great collector of full color prints, you own greeting cards, booklets for work and even your own business and dating cards. It seems sitting on top of every desk in every cubicle there is a printer. Why have desktop computers without a printer? Why have printers unless you can print color? Why not make millions and millions of needless prints when the boss isn’t looking? Why not have some of these amazing technologies at home?
“If, every American family, would simply purchase their inkjet O.E.M. printer cartridges from New Deal Ink & Toner Company Mechanicsburg Pa 17055 the total savings would correct the national economic housing problem” “I know it sounds silly but, if you are buying name branded inkjet cartridges from the name branded retailers, my research proves you’re getting ripped off big time.”
Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D.
http://www.newdealink.com/

You remember Fotomat, drop your roll of film off at their little parking lot building and the next day your picture prints, photographic prints, were ready to be picked up and enjoyed. One hour photo processing changed all that, big companies, little mom and pop shops sprang up by the thousands. Drop your film roll off and in one hour or less, you were looking at your full color prints, at the higher prices.
Major retailers like C.V.S. pharmacy, Walgreens and many others sold you prints, by the hundreds of billions, one hour photo print services and it was a great success. Then the digital camera.
“The retailers, like national pharmacy companies, are running away and shutting down their one hour photo processing operations, as quickly as possible. They take up a lot of room inside their retail stores and they don’t have any customers.” “American consumers no longer use film and they sure don’t use one hour photo services. It’s a junk business with no profits, but believe me; these big retailers have a plan. Are you ready for their next step to your wallet? They’ve jumped head long into something they don’t understand and their results show it. The big boy Walgreens is actually refilling inkjet ink cartridges, with little success so far, let me explain.”
Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D.
You didn’t buy Kodak film any more. In fact, you didn’t even use photo film any more. You took your pictures with a digital camera and started to print your own color prints on your very own digital color inkjet cartridge printer. Now, you’ve bought (printers) by the tens of millions and along with the inkjet printers you purchased billions of inkjet ink cartridges and Kodak almost went broke.
You have inherited a kingdom of technology, sitting right at home or in your office at work; this kingdom of printer technology requires a great deal of maintenance.

http://www.newdealink.com/

When you honestly look at maintaining your color inkjet printer at home it’s going to cost you a fortune. The foremost printer and copier producers, you know the names, Apple, Brother, Canon, Dell, Epson, Hewlett Packard (HP), I.B.M., Kyocera, Lexmark, Minolta, Mita, NEC, Okidata, Panasonic, Pitney Bowes, QMS, Ricoh, Samsung, Sharp, Tektronix, Toshiba, Xerox will just above give you a home or small office/business printer, copier, fax and scanner machine.
“Most recently Wal-mart has been having a super sale on Hewlett Packard printers and this inkjet color printer retails for $29.99.” “This is really the king of printers setting you up to buy their expensive ink. The inkjet ink cartridges costs more than the printer. Your color luxury is coming as a guest into your home, now you get to feed it. Consumers have become printer and inkjet ink cartridge slaves. If you could get rid of every printer in the homes of Americans each home would save from $200.00 to $300.00 per year. If you walk down your own street and count every other home they have an inkjet printer inside. The little business on the corner spends just about $750.00 per year on their own printer satisfaction and luxury.”

Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D.

These companies, you might know, use very few American workers and all of their products are manufactured overseas, the term is cheap labor, and then they import their own products back into the United States and put them on the market for you to buy. They retail to you through their supply chain partners like Wal-mart, Best Buy, Target, Office Depot, Staples, Office Max and other national players and you snap them up like hot cakes.
Major manufacturing companies and their supply chain partners do most things contrary to their customers and only make choices that contribute to their own wealth and prosperity. In order to be wealthier, they have to get more money from you almost any way they can.
“The manufacturing printer base, in my opinion is corrupt. Corrupt not in the dishonest way, or the crooked way but maybe in the shady way. It is true they have invested millions but they have also taken billions by harming their manufacturing base workers and their customers.” “I’m confident that they would argue that their foreign workers are better off now then they were before. It’s the two bowls of rice vs. only one bowl of rice economic theory that rich people use to explain their individual wealth. It’s the poor average worker being less poor as the printer and cartridge makers become very wealthy idea.” “The American consumer, the world consumer for that matter, went to the stores with their eyes wide open and bought the cheap printer and the expensive inkjet ink. The printer makers knew something that you could have never really known; having a printer is like having a child; they require a 24 hour a day, 7 day a week commitment for several years concerning food and ink, not to mention regular paper and even photo paper. Consumers have started to look at their printers from different angles. One big angle, how much does the ink cost and where can I buy some bargain.”
Joyce Dorothy Parker Ph.D.
Once you have something, like an inkjet printer, you inherited everything that came before it and everything that will come after it. To maintain your royal splendor of color you go to Wal-mart, Best buy and Target and scoop up inkjet ink cartridges by the tens of millions. Any when you buy the brand names of ink you are paying the absolute lofty price that they created for each of their customers. From top to bottom all the manufacturing companies do the same thing. Almost give you a cheap price printer and sell you an elevated retail priced inkjet ink cartridge.
Now, they have created your habits. Give you a cheap printer and sell you high priced inkjet cartridges. Customers, just like you, have stopped getting satisfaction from their home inkjet printers. You boss hates the LaserJet toner copier and printers at work, they cost more than you do. Everybody hates the high prices of inkjet ink cartridges, LaserJet toner print and copier cartridges, everybody includes you.

New Deal Ink & Toner Company understands that people want to save a great deal of money on their inkjet and LaserJet cartridges. We’ve created the economic relationship so you can do this very thing; our wholesale direct to the public warehouse is the new idea we call the new deal.
http://www.newdealink.com/
New Deal Ink and Toner Company
Mechanicsburg Pa

You can write us at newdealink@Live.com and we’ll send you our wholesale cartridge catalog. http://www.newdealink.com/

New Deal Ink and Toner Company
RETAIL STORE LOCATIONS
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA STORES
Email NewDealInk@Live.Com
Gregory Bodenhamer
Write to NewDealInk@Live.com we need independent inkjet and laser toner dealers and resellers in the following towns and cities for New Deal Ink and Toner Company You can quickly start your own home based business without any cash investment and join our other profitable stores. You can easily work from home or you own retail store. Improve your income and pay a lot less for inkjet laser cartridges at the same time. We offer the largest local inventories, the lowest inkjet prices. New Deal Ink & Toner Company Mechanicsburg Pa

17011 Camp Hill Pa 17025 Enola Pa 17043 Lemoyne Pa 17070 New Cumberland Pa 17093 Summerdale Pa 17319 Etters Pa 17339 Lewisberry Pa 17370 York Haven Pa 17008 Bowmansdale Pa 17011 Shiremanstown Pa 17027 Grantham Pa 17055 Mechanicsburg Pa 17050 Mechanicsburg Pa 17072 New Kingstown Pa 17007 Boiling Springs Pa 17013 Carlisle Pa 17015 Carlisle 17065 Mt Holly Sprints Pa 17081 Plainfield Pa 17266 Walnut Bottom Pa 17324 Gardners Pa 17337 Idaville Pa 17241 Newville Pa 17006 Blain Pa 17018 Dauphin Pa 17020 Duncannon Pa 17024 Elliotsburg Pa 17032 Halifax Pa 17037 Ickesburg Pa 17040 Landisburg Pa 17045 Liverpool Pa 17047 Loysville Pa 17053 Marysville Pa 17062 Millerstown Pa 17068 New Bloomfield Pa 17069 New Buffalo Pa 17074 Newport Pa 17090 Shermansdale Pa 17028 Grantville Pa 17033 Hershey Pa 17109 Progress Pa 17111 Swatara Pa 17112 Linglestown Pa 17019 Dillsburg Pa 17323 Franklintown Pa

Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com


Millers Newsstand (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) Alf and Peggy Miller 1 North Market Street Duncannon Pa Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership

Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

Postal Connections (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) Steve and Tracy Ritter 5231 Simpson Ferry Road Mechanicsburg Pa 17050 Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership

Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

NAS Computer Services (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) Brian & Angie 903 North River Road Halifax Pa 17032 Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

Hershey Computers Crown Computers (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) Mike Brown 48 West Caracas Ave Hershey Pennsylvania Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

E-Town Computers Crown Computers Elizabethtown Computers (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) 16 East High Street Elizabethtown Pennsylvania Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

Budget Printing Center John Winter (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) 4620 Carlisle Pike Mechanicsburg Pa 17050 Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

Middletown Saturdays Market Crown Computers (West Annex Building) (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) Crown Computers Middletown’s Saturdays Market Middletown Pennsylvania Flea Market Open Saturday Affordable ink toner Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

Millersburg Pharmacy, Inc. (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) 242 Market Street Millersburg Pennsylvania 17061 Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

Dal Hern Pharmacy (Authorized New Deal Ink & Toner Neighborhood Dealership) 4372 State Route 147 Herndon Pa 17830 Hewlett Packard Epson Canon Lexmark Brother Dell Inkjet Cartridges Laser Toner Cartridges Largest Inventory Lowest Price More Ink Less Money Authorized New Deal Ink Toner Company Pennsylvania Inkjet Printer Cartridge Dealership
Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com

#02 (C8721) Black #02 (C8771) Cyan #02 (C8772) Magenta #02 (C8773) Yellow #02 (C8774) Lt. Cyan #02 (C8775) Lt. Mag #10 (C4841) Cyan #10 (C4842) Yellow #10 (C4843) Magenta #10 (C4844) Black #11 (C4836) Cyan #11 (C4837) Magenta #11 (C4838) Yellow #15 (C6615) Black #16 (C1816) Photo #17 (C6625) Color #19 (C6628) Black #20 (C6614) Black #21 (C9351) Black #22 (C9352) Color #23 (C1823) Color #25 (51625) Color #26 (51626) Black #27 (C8727) Black #28 (C8728) Color #29 (51629) Black #41 (51641) Color #45 (51645) Black #49 (51649) Color #56 (C6656) Black #57 (C6657) Color #58 (C6658) Photo #59 (C9359) Photo #74 (CB335) Black #74XL (CB336) Black #75 (CB337) Color #75XL (CB338) Color #78 (C6578) Color #88 (C9385) Black #88XL (C9391) Cyan #88XL (C9392) Mag #88XL (C9393) Yellow #88XL (C9396) Black #92 (C9362) Black #93 (C9361) Color #94 (C8765) Black #95 (C8766) Color #96 (C8767) Black #97 (C9363) Color #98 (C9364) Black #99 (C9369) Photo #100 (C9368) Photo #110 (CB304) Color
NewDealInk@Live.com We need independent inkjet and laser toner dealers and resellers in the following towns and cities for New Deal Ink and Toner Company You can quickly start your own home based business without any cash investment. Improve your income and pay a lot less for inkjet laser cartridges at the same time. We offer the largest local inventories, the lowest inkjet prices.


Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com


17011 Camp Hill Pa 17025 Enola Pa 17043 Lemoyne Pa 17070 New Cumberland Pa 17093 Summerdale Pa 17319 Etters Pa 17339 Lewisberry Pa 17370 York Haven Pa 17008 Bowmansdale Pa 17011 Shiremanstown Pa 17027 Grantham Pa 17055 Mechanicsburg Pa 17050 Mechanicsburg Pa 17072 New Kingstown Pa 17007 Boiling Springs Pa 17013 Carlisle Pa 17015 Carlisle 17065 Mt Holly Sprints Pa 17081 Plainfield Pa 17266 Walnut Bottom Pa 17324 Gardners Pa 17337 Idaville Pa 17241 Newville Pa 17006 Blain Pa 17018 Dauphin Pa 17020 Duncannon Pa 17024 Elliotsburg Pa 17032 Halifax Pa 17037 Ickesburg Pa 17040 Landisburg Pa 17045 Liverpool Pa 17047 Loysville Pa 17053 Marysville Pa 17062 Millerstown Pa 17068 New Bloomfield Pa 17069 New Buffalo Pa 17074 Newport Pa 17090 Shermansdale Pa 17028 Grantville Pa 17033 Hershey Pa 17109 Progress Pa 17111 Swatara Pa 17112 Linglestown Pa 17019 Dillsburg Pa 17323 Franklintown Pa


New Deal Ink and Toner Company NewDealInk.Com Mechanicsburg Pa Email NewDealInk@Live.com NewDealInk.Com

Web http://www.NewDealInk.Com